They are very good lenses and a lot less money. Before getting the Canon 10-22 consider the Sigma 10-20, Tokina 12-24, and Tamron 11-18 (?). FEs to use until you can afford a real one if you decide you still want one. I would get the 10-20 now and worry about the FE later. When you consider the cost of a good FE, and if you only want to use it occassionally, an aux. They are not very good, but if you stop down to f/8 or so you can get a decent image. The cheap FEs are auxilliary lenses that screw onto the front of another lens. There was a good article in Popular Photography on fisheyes a few months ago. You can eliminate the distortion using postprocessing. You don't want to overuse it and you can minimize the distortion by using it properly. I use it mostly indoors, but I use it outside also. I find that nothing opens up space like a FF FE. The usefullness of a FE depends on the type of shooting that you do and your own preferences. One produces a circular image and one fills the frame. Between the two, the 10-20 gets much more use, but there are times when only the fisheye will do the job. I have a Sigma 10-20 and a Nikon 10.5mm FF fisheye. They do tend to include a lot of foreground, however, so some people just prefer to assemble panoramas from shots taken at longer focal lengths (hidden in PS CS3 under File>Automate>Photomerge). They are very useful, and not only for hotel rooms. Still, it is reasonably priced and is an excellent option. This is a high-quality lens, and it’s also the highest-priced lens on our list. It creates images with a diagonal fisheye effect and a 180-degree angle of view. Our top-ranked fisheye lens for Nikon is the NIKKOR 16mm. Ultrawides are another kettle of ghoti altogether. Nikon AF Fisheye-NIKKOR 16mm f/2.8D Lens. Unfortunately, since they are essentially one-trick ponies, few people find it worthwhile to spend a lot of money on them to get the good ones. These are commonly used for things like interior shots to show the whole room (and make it look huge too, especially in those shots on-line for hotels).įisheyes were originally developed for 180-degree sky photos for meteorologists, I think, but the effect is entrancing for a brief while, and most people tire of it very soon.Ĭheap fisheyes are usually not that great, either in adapters (e.g., 0.25X) or as primes on their own. It is very difficult to achieve this goal, so even ultrawides typically show some barrel distortion, for example. A few fisheyes, especially on APS-C cameras, will cover the while image, but still show the curving lines of the breed in which the only straight lines will be the horizon and vertical line in the exact center of the field.Īn ultrawide lens may have the identical focal length (e.g., 12mm) but is very carefully designed to be "rectilinear"- that is to eliminate (so far as is possible) the curving and converging lines. No effort is made in its design to eliminate the converging and curvature of lines commonly known as distortion. FISHEYE is NOT the same thing as an ULTRAWIDE ANGLE lens.Ī fisheye normally makes a circular image, at least on a 35mm sensor.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |